This Week: I vote on RapidRide buses. Last Week: New DPW! New Chief! Redondo Restroom. Great July 4 fireworks report! Septic Party in North Hill! Airport Documentary at Museum Of Flight....
Most Recent Article [more articles below]
Previous Articles
Weekly Update: 07/07/2024
Leave a comment on Weekly Update: 07/07/2024Downtown traffic congestion
1 Comment on Downtown traffic congestionby Richard Kennedy
President Des Moines Historical Society
As someone who lived in Des Moines from 1955 through 1999, I thought I might give a brief history of downtown traffic congestion.
Before the Big Catch Plaza, there was a road parallel to the north side of Albertson’s (now Dollar Tree). As such there were two traffic signals very close to each other (see red dots on photograph below) on Marine View Drive South. These two signals, in conjunction with the signal at 1st Avenue South and Des Moines Way (now Des Moines Memorial Drive) often backed up southbound traffic on 1st Avenue South to South 208th Street. It also adversely impacted southbound traffic on Des Moines Way.
One-way Couplet
The City’s attempt to solve downtown traffic congestion involved the use of a one-way couplet. The following headlines are from The Des Moines News:
- Jan. 17, 1973 — City, state schedule meet on one-way street plan
- Jan. 24, 1973 — Time to decide on one-way streets
- Feb. 7, 1973 — One-way street opposition mounted
- Feb. 7, 1973 — Alternatives:
- Feb. 14, 1973 — Merchants uniting to fight proposed one-way street plan
- Feb. 21, 1973 — City Council o.k.’s, one-way street trial [4 month period]
One-Way Street Four Month Trial
- May 9, 1973 — One way system to open
- May 30, 1973 — One way couplet trial results in four accidents, many complaints
- June 13, 1973 — Merchants demand immediate halt to trial one way street couplet
- June 27, 1973 — Merchants to push one-way street fight
- July 4, 1973 — Businessman against one-way couplet give counsel petitions signed by 4000
- July 11, 1973 — Shoppers, businessman favor two way traffic
- Aug. 15, 1973 — State proposes modified street plan
- Aug. 29, 1973 — One-way streets, water problems keep Des Moines councilman busy
- Sep. 5, 1973 — NEWS conducting opinion poll on one-way street plan
- Sep. 12, 1973 — Readers oppose one-way streets
- Oct. 3, 1973 — City may return to two way streets
- Oct. 17, 1973 — Two way streets: A question of when?
- Nov. 7, 1973 — City Council to ponder one-way street issue
- Nov. 14, 1973 — City asks for immediate return of two way streets
- Dec. 19, 1973 — Return to two-way streets awaits marking of stripes
Aftermath
After the failure of the one-way couplet idea, the city turned its attention to the two traffic signals at South 216th and 218th Streets. Big Catch Plaza was built moving South 218th Street to the intersection of Marine View Drive South and South 216th Street. This eliminated one traffic signal. See the diagram below where the red dot shows the remaining traffic signal.
This did provide a good deal of traffic relief for a number of years. Recently, southbound traffic is again starting to back up significantly.
This ends the history of downtown traffic congestion. The following suggestion is from me alone and does not necessarily represent the opinion of the Des Moines Historical Society. The traffic signals from Des Moines Memorial Drive South to the Kent-Des Moines Road should be synchronized to the speed limit. This would allow southbound traffic on 1st Avenue South/Marine View Drive South to travel the length of the downtown area at the speed limit without stopping or backups. The technology now exists to implement this and it would cost far less than and physical changes to downtown streets.
Weekly Update: 06/30/2024
1 Comment on Weekly Update: 06/30/2024Weekly Update: 06/23/2024
Leave a comment on Weekly Update: 06/23/2024Weekly Update: 06/16/2024
Leave a comment on Weekly Update: 06/16/2024Some bits of business…
This is a longee. Partially because last week was action packed! And partially because I’m hoping to take next week off. 😀
Future Agendas
Future Agendas is the closest thing the City currently has to a calendar of upcoming City Council topics. It’s not dynamic, ie. you have to click it every time you want to see a new version. And it’s not always accurate. But until we develop a genuine calendar, this can be very useful if there is a particular issue you don’t want to miss.
A passing of note
Kaylene Moon passed away suddenly and peacefully over the weekend at Wesley at the age of 374. Or maybe it just seemed like it because I can’t imagine a time when she was not here. However, until just a couple of years ago, she could’ve passed for someone decades younger than her real age– which I chalk up to one of the most positive attitudes I’ve ever encountered. Her combo-platter of genuine sweetness, service, and an energy level one usually associates with hamsters made me feel so inadequate by comparison–Between you, me and the wall? Frankly sometimes I could barely stand to hear her voice when she called–which was also uniquely pleasant, come to think of it. D’Oh!
I saw her last only a few days ago at the Legacy Foundation Bayside Ball. And of course, she was schlepping boxes.
(See what I mean? Absolutely maddening! 😀 )
Saying that she served on the Senior Services Advisory Committee or listing her numerous public service activities over the decades would not begin to describe her importance to both the senior community and the City of Des Moines.
In short, Ms. Moon was exactly the kind of resident the City used to have awards ceremonies for.
She will be dearly missed and I will post details on how you can help celebrate her life very soon.
City Manager Stuff
City Manager’s Report June 14, 2024
This week’s #Bombshell was the hiring of Ted Boe as our new Chief of Police. I have somewhat mixed feelings. I’ll get the negativity out of the way first.
- This is an impulse buy, something we engage in far too frequently. The circumstances concerning the departure of Tim Gately should be investigated. Just as the circumstances concerning the hiring/departure of Michael Matthias should be made clear. Just as the circumstances of the hiring/firing of the previous police chief should have been made clear. It’s a pattern. And to be clear a lessons learned is never about ‘blame’. It’s about accountability and improving the organisation.
-
On the other hand, I have had a chance to observe Ted Boe pretty carefully for the past six years, first because his presentations to the Burien City Council on public safety were so much more informative and transparent than the ones our City would receive. Plus, he engaged in community outreach superior to our previous Chiefs in pretty much every way–so he was simply more places to be seen. And, if you’ve watched Burien at all in the past few years, he’s demonstrated an ability to maintain his cool under circumstances that would make most sane people quit.
So if I sound equivocal, it’s only because opportunistic decision making is fine in small doses, but when it becomes a habit, any sense of strategic planning goes out the window. We truly cannot imagine doing anything other than snap decisions with no accountability. If Mr. Boe turns out to be a success, as I assume will be the case, that’s great. But my concern is that it will simply enable even more impulse buys.
This Week
Who knows! Trying to take a few days off. But if something comes up? Don’t let that stop ya. Call me any ol’ time. (206) 878-0578. 😀
Last Week
Monday: Regional Transit Center I took a tour of THE NERVE CENTER OF OUR BUS SYSTEM! 😀 It’s actually pretty fascinating. I also learned about the concept of microtransit which is sort of like Uber for public transit. Metro has a version of it called Metro Flex. running in other parts of King County and it looks like something worth checking out for several areas in Des Moines which have no good connections to bus or Light Rail.
Tuesday: Port of Seattle Commission (Agenda) The Commission approved bond sales/refunds of about $850,000,000 (that’s a lotta ‘m’s, Martha! 😀 ) to fund several large projects to be included in the coming airport expansion.
Wednesday: King County Emergency Management Committee
Given my various comments on the absolutely terrible passenger ferry program 😀 , you may think this is a set-up. Not true. EMAC does mock exercises on how to handle all kinds of major emergencies.
This meeting ran through how to handle a disaster on a Water Taxi. I’ve written about it a bunch in the past, but one of the first initiatives by our last City Manager was another #bombshell–moving then police chief Delgado over to a completely new position called ‘Emergency Management Director’. At the time there was a lot of talk about using the Marina as a ‘key strategic point for regional disasters’. It was all hooey of course. But it shouldn’t have been. When (not if) there is a genuine regional emergency, Des Moines Marina really could be the center of the action between Seattle and Tacoma.
Also during the absolutely terrible passenger ferry pilot program you the City talk a lot about ‘multi-modal transit options’. Which was also hooey. But in terms of genuine emergency planning it’s totally not. When (not if) there is a large-scale emergency here, a key question for most people in Des Moines will be, How do I get up to Pacific Highway or down to the Marina?
Emergency Management people have really amazing solutions for handling smaller issues. However, there’s simply no realistic plan in place for handling a large regional disaster of any kind. But to the extent that there is, as with transit, the discussion tends to be dominated by other parts of King County. My interest in both EMAC and RTC are kinda the same-at least getting Des Moines into conversations about moving people in a real way.
The problem, of course, is money. If we do end up getting some sort of plausible ferry service, hopefully we will also be eligible for some form of grants which will help us with the real emergency management challenge.
Thursday 4:00pm Transportation Committee. (Agenda) Highlight: Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) Final Plan
Thursday 5:00pm Environment Committee Meeting 5:00pm. Recap below. (Agenda)
Thursday 6:00pm City Council Meeting 6:00pm. Recap below. (Agenda)
Friday: Redondo Food Trucks! Strictly speaking, this isn’t really a ‘government function’. But most of the City’s promotions center on ‘Marina’. And someone needs to speak out on the critical issue of those amazing egg rolls are at Momo Express! 😀 A variety of wonderful Food Trucks every Friday this summer in Redondo from 4:30 to dusk.
June 13 Environment Committee Recap
(Agenda) We packed more interesting stuff into 50 minutes than many three hour full City Council meetings. Well, I thought so. 🙂
Public Works Yard Groundwater Remediation Update. We’ve had an ongoing issue with a long ago de-commissioned fuel storage tank out in back of the engineering building. I made a cheeky comment that, years ago, as a homeowner, I was able to pay once to clear an old underground oil furnace, and as far as ‘environmental remediation’ I was ‘done’ with it.
What I’ve since learned is how hard it is to really mitigate any groundwater leaks because they tend to keep coming back again and again, even after you think they’re done. The City, recognising this site’s proximity both to Water District 54, and surrounding neighbourhoods, has gone above and beyond to continue to monitor and mitigate the site. Well done.
Capital Improvements We heard about about several capital improvement projects concerning storm water, specifically one in Redondo. It’s not like there’s a ‘decision’ point, but I hope people pay attention because I don’t think the public understands that when you annex an area like Redondo into your City you often get more than you bargained for. There are a myriad of ongoing drainage issues between Marine Hills on the top and the beach. In my free time, I should put together a graphic of all the work the City has done to make the area safer from flooding. Until then, imagine a plate of really old spaghetti. That was the state of the storm water grid when Redondo came into Des Moines in 1996.
6PPDQ and Coho Salmon Engineer Beekley mentioned, almost as an afterthought, that the City was optimistic about receiving a grant to test a new process for filtering 6PPDQ from storm water. Long story short, Coho salmon (my personal fave, yum), have been almost non-existent here for a long time now. UW researchers discovered that a major cause is a chemical called 6PPD used in every automotive tire since the ’60’s. 6PPD is the miraculous goop that basically made tires immune from catastrophic failure. But microscopic bits of it are constantly sloughing off onto the road, which goes into the water, which gets converted to 6PPDQ,(there will be a quiz) and 6PPDQ just kills baby Coho. I would be absolutely thrilled for Des Moines to be a part of this testing phase and I’m grateful to the City for doing this.
StART Committee
The Committee invited our two new community members of the Sea-Tac Airport Roundtable. They provided the Committee their feedback on how StART is going and they were not shy–plus some really good reports which most people don’t see.
Look, asking anyone to summarise ‘the airport’ in 20 minutes is like asking someone to explain ‘The Middle East’ in 25 words or less. In fact, that’s the problem. The Port is only too happy to tell you how complicated all this is–and also how everyone is already doing their best. They’re totally not.
For example, the Port is currently conducting a Part 150 Study, which is exactly the kind of complicated, boring thing that makes people’s eyes glaze over. But it will determine everything from who gets sound insulation to what kind of impact fees the City will be able to negotiate (if it so chooses.) If you are interested in airport issues–especially sound insulation, I would strongly encourage you to read this… Part 150 For Dummies.
Public Comment We also had two most excellent public comments.
- The first was from a resident who wants to add multiple cottages (ADUs) onto her property. She has correctly identified the real challenge–namely hookups. There are now some really nice, and very affordable pre-built structures, as well as pre-approved templates for builders. The problem is that our building code and zoning were designed more for independent services (electric, water, sewer, storm) for every building, ie. the traditional ‘single family dwelling’. The question is: can we provide code which provisions these types of ADUs much less expensively, while still maintaining performance, health and safety? She provided some really great research and my hope is that we can get answers (and solutions) implemented as part of our upcoming Comprehensive Plan.
- The other commenter was concerned about tree canopy and a possible grant opportunity from the Department of Ecology. Again, this is exactly the kind of feedback I’d hoped the Committee could receive–useful ideas we can research to expand the mission.
June 13 City Council Meeting Recap
Public Comment
- We had another public comment from District #5 School Board Director Azeb Hagos, which is already two more than her predecessor. 😉 Seriously, this kind of communication is always appreciated.
- A representative from Waterland Pride invited the public to various events on June 22 and 23. He mentioned first seeing the Pride flag when he and his husband moved here in 2022. I think he meant the police station–officers from the police department began raising the flag there. And now City Hall follows suit. 🙂
- We had a report from King County Library System. They are killing it with programs of interest to basically everyone. I hope we can find a way to integrate their events calendar with ours–er… when we get one. 😀 Seriously, they have so much ‘stuff’ of interest to the community it kills me that more people don’t know about it all.
- We had a very disturbing comment from a resident concerning mishandling of a complaint she had with the police. It is not the Council’s place to comment on this sort of thing, except to say that if you watched the meeting it is disturbing and I want you to know I am taking it seriously.
Consent Agenda
- We removed gender (ie. male) references to City Manager in our municipal code. I confess, I’d never read the previous section of code (how often does the issue of hiring a City Manager come up?) But once you see it? Yikes. See below.
- South King County Housing/Homelessness Partnership (SKHHP) Annual Budget. I think this is our sixth year in this thing and… spoiler alert… I still don’t think we’ve built a single new unit of housing with it in Des Moines. And whether you’re a fan of ‘affordable housing’ or not, you do like money, right? See below.
I also want to point out an issue of decorum. During this presentation, Councilmember Mahoney asked the presenter (Dorsol Plants) a question which began like this…
“This was an excellent report, Dorsol. I’m still trying to get used to that [name]. Your mom not like you or something, man?”
Mr. Plants handled it with good humour–as anyone with an uncommon name learns to do ( 😀 ). And I am 100% certain my colleague meant no ill will. However, our own City Council Protocol Manual says directly that no one at City Hall should be subject to personal remarks.
FWIW, In addition to long service in the often thankless field of Affordable Housing, Mr. Plants served two tours in Iraq, and was a candidate for Seattle City Council.
We had a proclamation on Juneteenth. Getting real here: My wife, like most of the Black community in Detroit, was always familiar with Juneteenth. It was discussed a lot in the 1970’s and there was a genuine debate as to whether to celebrate Juneteenth (the ‘real end of the Civil War’) or January 1st–the day of the Emancipation Proclamation, which others felt was more meaningful as ‘the official end of slavery’.
But since we’ve lived here, frankly, I don’t think I heard too much about any of it until relatively recently. I only mention this because a lot of cultural changes seem to happen ‘suddenly’. Many people work on them in the background of course, but all of a sudden they sort of reach a tipping point and everyone gets on board.
Port of Seattle Grant
I pulled Item #7, a $33,000 general-purpose economic development grant from the Port of Seattle which we apply for almost every year. In past years we used the dough (supposedly) to do some Marina Development planning. This year it’s to help us pay for doing our Comprehensive Plan update. Whatever.
I always object because, for some unknown reason, we always include a few seemingly ‘harmless’ sentences in support of something the Port calls their Century Agenda. These sentences are not required to obtain the grant.
Because these sentences seem harmless, most years my colleagues look at me like I’m nuts and the vote is 1-6. This year it was 2-5. Progress! 😀 But those five are completely wrong.
Mayor Buxton made several comments saying that, while the Port is not living up to its own aspirations to reduce the negative impacts of the airport, instead of not supporting the Century Agenda, we should support it but also ‘hold their feet to the fire’ to live up to those aspirations. I don’t know what to do with that.
The Century Agenda is the Port’s strategic plan. And it’s hard to talk about ‘strategic plans’ because most individuals, and definitely not the City of Des Moines (sorry), ever have a strategic plan. But big businesses, like the Port, most definitely do.
I think the problem is that we tend to think of the Port as being a ‘government’. And all governments have a ton of big aspirational crapola (life, liberty, the pursuit of whatever.) So perhaps electeds think of the Century Agenda like all our proclamations, not anything to be taken seriously.
But the Port is not a ‘government’ like Des Moines. It’s more like a serious set of businesses created by the State of Washington, called a Special Purpose District.
So underneath the pretty brochure, with all the wonderful aspirational blather about Diversity! Environmental Stewardship! Economic Empowerment! 1Marzipan Rainbows! are hundreds of pages with equally serious, and specific business targets, such as air cargo tonnage, landing fees, airport property development.
If you were to watch the 2012 Port Commission meeting where the Century Agenda was born, and compared it to where they are today, you’d see that they were hitting all their targets. All the flights? They didn’t just appear out of thin air. The Port hired professionals to go out and compete (hard) against other airports, to recruit new airlines, to move operations to Sea-Tac, to promote tourism. Like any successful business they willed all those flights to come here. And they will continue to do everything possible to hit their future targets. Because flights are 80% of their revenue. That is the Century Agenda. It’s a business plan. And the idea that we would be naive enough to believe anything else is ridiculous.
This does not mean that various programs the Port engages in (apprenticeships, salmon recovery, etc.) are not real. It just means that if you look carefully none of them ever do anything to address our concerns.
The reason we needed to remove that ‘male’ language from the municipal code is that it creates an unconscious bias as to what a ‘City Manager’ should look like. The language changes how you think about the job.
The reason we should remove ‘Century Agenda’ from any dealings with the Port of Seattle is because whether we realise it or not, we have developed an unconscious bias as to what the Port is and what our relationship should be.
Three decades ago we made several major choices in our relationship with the Port. They could have yielded millions in annual revenue and we would not be where we are financially today. Every year we have opportunities to change direction. But until we stop letting ‘harmless’ language like that slide, we cannot hope to obtain better than $33,000 a year.
City Manager Recruiting Update
We were told that, so far, ten people have applied for the position. Apparently three of those leads came directly through the City, not the recruiter web site. I did not say out loud, “If we provide the majority of the leads, do we get a discount?” 😀 We will start reviewing applications at the beginning of July.
2023 4th Quarter Financial Report
Too much to go into, but one ‘detail’ the Finance director mentioned was how Federal Way moves a million dollars around to optimise returns. Lucky them. The City of SeaTac does something similar with impact fees they get from the Port of Seattle (see above comments on Century Agenda–that’s one of the choices we could have made.)
You’ll often hear people talk about ‘the three-legged stool of municipal finance’. Property Tax, Sales Tax, Utility Tax. In Des Moines, it’s more like a fourth leg. Property taxes are capped, utility taxes are maxed out, and we never developed a decent retail environment. So whether we like it or not, we have become utterly dependent on real estate to keep us afloat–the fourth leg. It’s not ‘inflation’ that is killing us, it’s the lack of construction projects, combined with the fact that we have so many older homeowners who are aging in place rather than moving to Boca Raton. 😀 So… given that dynamic, why the City isn’t doing everything humanly possible to encourage building more places for people to live and pay taxes? Ya got me.
Transportation Improvement Plan Update
One needs to conduct a public hearing whenever the City updates the Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP). Nobody ever shows up, unless they have some financial interest because they are incredibly boring.
Speaking of ‘lessons learned’ I asked the City if they had done a lessons learned on 24th Ave. First of all, because we owe the public an explanation, and second because we don’t want it to happen again. According to Interim City Manager George, the City is trying to go after the various utilities for some of these costs. Good. One of my colleagues shrugged off my concerns by saying that all projects have these kinds of issues–particularly the 216th rebuild a decade ago. I hate to contradict a colleague, but he was not here during that build and I live near there. That project was nowhere near as fraught as 24th Ave.
Apparently I unintentionally blind-sided the City in asking about a project referred to as a Bike Lane at the Marina. I’m honestly curious about this. For a long time, the City and County have had a ‘master plan’ to create a continuous bike/walking trail connecting the Des Moines Creek Trail with the Lake To Sound Trail with Barnes Creek Trail. The idea is that you’d be able to bike from, say Des Moines Elementary at 240th, west to Marine View Drive, make a left at the Red Robin, north to the Marina, and then over to the Beach Park… and off ya go to Woodinville! 😀
The thing is… I’ve never seen even a drawing of that Bike Trail. And since we’re supposedly at 60% Design on the Marina Steps project, I figured somebody had a clue on this. Apparently not.
But the more that I think about it, the more irritated I’m getting. To have something on a Transportation Improvement Plan without even a frickin’ drawing as to where it will go doesn’t seem like something that should be an item on a planning document.
Again, the Port of Seattle has a plan. Businesses have plans. They’re for realz documents.
Building Code Update
One needs to conduct a public hearing whenever the City updates the building code. Nobody ever shows up, unless they have some financial interest, because they are incredibly boring. This one involved fire code, which is hyper-mega-boring. And since no one (say from the fire sprinkler industry 😀 ) showed up either to support or object, I assume it’s fine. 🙂
One bit of code is to require building signs to be easier to read–so the fire department can find the building. I asked the fire department to write the City a ticket so they would make the sign over City Hall easier to read. In my mind. 😀 Seriously, the sign over City Hall is really hard to read.
Final Comments
As has become common, Councilmember Nutting made mention of the prevalence of suicide among men–especially in the construction trades. He pointed out Men’s Health Month as a resource to get help.
1One of these may not actually be in the Century Agenda.
2OK, one time, they gave us some money to help improve the front of 216th. But that was only so they could develop their property, which brings in almost no revenue for us.
Weekly Update: 06/09/2024
1 Comment on Weekly Update: 06/09/2024Some bits of business…
Future Agendas
Future Agendas is the closest thing the City currently has to a calendar of upcoming City Council topics. It’s not dynamic, ie. you have to click it every time you want to see a new version. And it’s not always accurate. But until we develop a genuine calendar, this can be very useful if there is a particular issue you don’t want to miss.
City Manager Stuff
City Manager’s Report June 07, 2024
- Apparently I missed a chance to see the Interim City Manager running down 216th as part of a Special Olympics fundraiser.
- Also, the City is on now on ‘The Gram’. Check it out @waterlandcity
- The City has also published the job listing for City Manager. If I read this? I’d apply. 🙂
ADU RFI
I’ve gotten several responses to my request for interest in ADUs. THANK YOU! As you may know, we are updating our Comprehensive Plan, which will change City zoning rules for a generation. I don’t have to many specifics for you yet, except:
- There are a lot of you out there. But you have different needs. Many of you want to create multi-generational living so you can age in place with your kids and grandkids. Others want to create cottages on a large property to add income.
- I want you to have as much notice as possible when these hearings come up and I want you to show up so you can show the City that this really is a big deal.
I’m hoping the City can make these updates as flexible and inexpensive as possible.
This Week
Monday: Regional Transit Center I’m taking a tour of THE NERVE CENTER OF OUR BUS SYSTEM! 😀
Tuesday: Port of Seattle Commission (Agenda) The Commission will be approving bond sales/refunds of about $850,000,000 (that’s a lotta ‘m’s, Martha! 😀 ) to fund several large projects to be included in the SAMP (airport expansion.)
Wednesday: King County Emergency Management Committee
Thursday 4:00pm Transportation Committee. (Agenda) Highlight: Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) Final Plan
Thursday 5:00pm Environment Committee Meeting 5:00pm. (Agenda) Public Works Yard Groundwater Remediation Update; CIP Project Update; StART Update. Sea-Tac Airport Roundtable is a combo-platter of two community members and someone from the staff to discuss community impacts from the airport. We have two brand new community members and the Committee will get to hear how they think things are going.
Thursday 6:00pm City Council Meeting 6:00pm (Agenda) Highlights:
- 2023 4th Quarter Financial Report
- Juneteenth Proclamation.
- Gender neutral references to City Manager in DMMC
- South King County Housing/Homelessness Partnership (SKHHP) Annual Budget. I think this is our sixth year in this thing and… spoiler alert… I still don’t think we’ve built a single new unit of housing with it in Des Moines.
Last Week
Wednesday: I attended this Highline School District Listening Session at Mt. Rainier High School with our School Board Director Azeb Hagos and Normandy Park Director Melissa Petrini. It was an absolute model of community outreach. There were two tables, one for each Director, and it was fascinating listening doing a ‘split-screen’. There were parents with passionate feelings and totally opposing ideologies. But somehow, the process remained not only civil but actually constructive.
Thursday 4:00pm Finance Committee. Agenda I gave this one the Action-Packed Seal Of Approval and I was not disappointed. Recap below.
Thursday 5:00pm Public Safety Committee (Agenda) Highlights:
Staffing update. Apparently, we’re down two officers. And this is a discussion we (I mean ‘the United States’) needs to have. There is this constant discussion about the difficulty in recruiting police officers. That’s true, but it isn’t the whole truth. We (and again everyone) do get applicants. The difficulty is in getting people who can pass the background check. In my first year on the Council there were something like eight applicants and zero passed. The profession is simply not attracting enough of the right kind of people at the moment.
Thursday 6:00 City Council Study Session Recap follows. (Agenda)
Saturday: South King Fire Open House 223rd and 16th Ave. I went to take a picture of the Fire Engines. But what I really wanted to see is information on this: Fire Benefit Charge | South King Fire & Rescue, WA – Official Website. In short, SKF is putting their own tax on the August ballot. They’re not calling it a ‘tax’ because it is not based solely on property value, but instead factors in how much each home may require their services. It’s an interesting discussion and I encourage you to read their flyer carefully.
Saturday: Part 150 Study Workshop
The airport has begun a new Part 150 Noise Study. ‘Part 150’ refers to a section of FAA regulations whereby airports analyse their noise impact on the surrounding community. The traditional purpose has been to determine the Noise Boundary called DNL65. A couple of us from Sea-Tac Noise.Info attended and left with real concerns over how this might affect the possibility of new Port Packages and updates for homes with existing sound insulation. Read about it here.
Finance Committee Meeting Recap
I’m gonna open with sort of a public engagement Rorshach Test. I showed up five minutes before the meeting and the front door to City Hall was locked. My colleagues and staff were already there having a chat, I assume because they/we all have key cards and tend to enter ‘the back way’.
Folks. These are PUBLIC MEETINGS.
I can’t believe this doesn’t bother anyone else. But this is not the first this has happened–just during my tenure. If we want more people to show up, we should act like we want more people to show up. Unlocking the door might be a good first step. 🙂
Parks and Recreation Finances
We got a much more detailed report than in years past, but it’s kinda organised around place rather than function. ie. it groups events at the Des Moines Activity Center together, whether they’re softball or senior or whatever.
That may seem tiny, but it’s one reason I voted against the whole Events Planning Enterprise Fund last year. If we had proceeded to make Events Planning an Enterprise Fund, that just would have meant that we treat ‘events’ as a business–with its own profit/loss statement. Guess what? We should be doing that regardless! We don’t need an Enterprise Fund. We just need to organise our reporting better so we can see what’s making money– and then act accordingly.
(And to be clear: a lot of ‘parks’ stuff isn’t supposed to make money. But wanting to know the true cost of everything we do? That should be standard equipment.)
Closing the Budget Gap
According to the packet:
Ways to raise revenues
1) Review Parks, Recreation, and Senior Services program fees
2) Review possibility of raising B+O Tax Rates and Business License fees
Ways to reduce expenditures
1) Freeze Vacancies
2) Review Ongoing Long-term Extra Hires
3) Review Professional Services contracts
4) Restructure Departments for Efficiencies
Standard stuff. People get irritated when I say things like that. But saying something is ‘standard’ is not the same thing as ‘painless’. Having a baby is, usually a standard process. 😀 (I kill me.) But my hope is that we can do a lot more. On both sides of the ledger.
Five-Year Forecasts
The Finance Director presented one for “if the Levy Lid Lift passes.” And one for “if it doesn’t.” Spoiler alert: they’re both worth a big gulp soda. And ironically, that is why I’m less concerned for 2025. The real pain isn’t for a year.
My final comment during the meeting was to say that I was probably the most optimistic person at the table. I wasn’t being cavalier. We’re nowhere near where I hope we can get to, but this really is some of the best financial information I’ve seen in many years. And not feeling quite so blind feels like real progress.
Remember when me and Buxton and Steinmetz visited a Dry Stack tour a few weeks ago? I complimented the Port of Edmond’s on their financial reports. Because having that kind of research makes it clear that a Dry Stack facility will make money here–unlike our ‘Ferry’ which never provided transparent information (see below.) Edmonds’ reporting is super-clear. That is what I want for each of our departments. Detailed, but clear and easy to understand reports for each department so that every councilmember (and reasonably educated member of the public) can see how we’re really doing.
May 2024 Sales Tax Report
This is also a real upgrade. I just want to point out that what these reports call ‘sales tax’ is not what you call ‘sales tax’ (ie. ‘retail’). We group together a ton of one-time fees into ‘sales tax’, including home sales (REET) and construction fees.
I don’t like lumping them together because, as I wrote last week, they perform very different functions. And this is important: it’s not just that you take in different pots of money, these sources are used for different things and they each have their up and down cycles. As we’ve recently learned, depending on a constant churn of home sales or construction (or low inflation) is not a great idea.
As I say over and over, building is not the same thing as economic development. IOW: when you build a box, you get a sweet chunk of one-time money. Then, the community has to live with what is inside that box for 40 years. If it’s taxable property, we get some property tax. Cool. And if it’s the kind of business we should be encouraging, some reliable sales and B&O taxes–which is even better. But if the box is tax exempt (Port of Seattle), or no one rents it, or whoever rents the space doesn’t make any money? The City suffers. Building is not economic development. It’s the
What we’ve done since I’ve lived here is to equate building boxes with economic development. Probably because so many Cms have been contractors/realtors/property managers. Building is not economic development.
June 6, 2024 City Council Meeting Recap
Mayor Buxton was MIA with no excuse. But since this is the first meeting she’s missed that I can recall, I did not stress. Deputy Mayor Steinmetz acted as presiding officer.
Every meeting tends to have a theme, and this one was “JC, you’re too nice.” So true.
Ferry Update?
BOMBSHELL!
Speaking of professional service contracts I want to review… 😀 We had a presentation from Ferry Consultant Peter Philips. According to the presentation, he has something along the line of a verbal agreement from King County to foot the bill for a Water Taxi between Des Moines and Seattle in the next couple of years. King County would buy the Chilkat Express (the 62 passenger boat used in 2022) and run the entire service themselves at no cost to the City.
And in 5-6 years or so, King County would hope to upgrade this ferry to an electric version.
And then there’s a concept of a (literal) docking station. The dock would float off shore and charge the boat while 1Dr. No and the rest of SPECTRE debark. However, as my example implies, since this tech only exists in the next James Bond movie, I am somewhat skeptical.
Plus, the Dept. Of Commerce has given $132,000 to do an Economic Impact Study. Which I also don’t understand. If this is King County’s plan why do we need to do an economic impact study?
Success?
I was waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaayyyyyyy too nice. When someone is telling you how great something is, it’s hard to say, “Ummmm… no, not really.” He gave a recap of this glowing Ferry Presentation & Final Report – 01 Dec 2022
I got chided for wanting too much ‘detail’ and not wanting ‘surprises’. Which is a bit odd considering these are supposed to be (cough) ‘study sessions’. But here is something I am certain of:
We lost a ton of money running that Ferry in 2022. Thank God the boat died in 2023 or we would’ve lost even more. How much did we lose? I’m honestly not sure because there has been no straightforward accounting. All I can say for sure is that we started on April 14, 2022 by dedicating $975,000 for a ‘pilot program’. And now, after two years, we have $400,000 left in ARPA money–to be re-allocated somewhere else in the 2024 budget. However much we lost? That was your money, folks. Here is my best guess based on public records from 2022 actuals.
Ferry Contract 2023 (4 months) anticipated budget based on 2022 (4 months)
Assuming 120 days of service (May-15 thru September-15)
Vessel, Ops Management and Projected Revenue are taken from Agenda Packet
*Fuel and moorage costs taken from last year.
+Marketing, mobilization and project report taken from last year's initial budget. These costs were not included in the final December report.
Vessel | 587,206 |
Ops Management | 107,000 |
*Fuel | 208,000 |
*Moorage | 70,000 |
+Marketing | 70,600 |
+Mobilization | 60,500 |
+Project Report | 9,200 |
Total Costs | 1,103,506 |
Projected Revenues | 286,748 |
Profit (Loss) | (816,758) |
---|
Vessel, Ops Management and Projected Revenue are taken from Agenda Packet
*Fuel and moorage costs taken from last year.
+Marketing, mobilization and project report taken from last year's initial budget. These costs were not included in the final December report.
So when Mr. Philips says things like “We got 400% more passengers than we expected”? I cry foul (language 😀 ) Actually, the Council received no forecast of any kind before the 2022 sailing. I know because I asked for it.
But even with that 400% ‘boost’, we averaged about $6 in revenue per rider. Guess what? The true cost of running any ferry is actually about $24 a ride. That’s not me saying so. That’s King County saying so.
Alley Naming goes nowhere
After three years, and even after the Citizens Advisory Committee did a community poll narrowing the choices down to three, still the Council could not agree on naming a frickin’ Alley. An alley. Did I mention that the entire decision was to name… an alley? 😀 Not a city. Not a galaxy. An alley.
As I said last week, my preference was to name it “Jack’s Alley” But I did not speak. There were three ‘factions’: Two for Waterland Way, two for Backstage Alley, one for “let’s do another community poll.”
I did not want to screw around, because the real value in naming the thing is to allow businesses located in the <whatever you call it> to be found on mapping software. In other words, if you were to look for Cubanos On Wheels (now closed) you might be directed to Marine View Drive, not the alley. And until we improve our signage and marketing, that’s our best shot at helping more people find our businesses!
So I gave my vote to the initial motion from Mahoney/Nutting, which was Waterland <something>?
At that moment, there was a simple majority. 3-2-1. So a vote should have been taken and the issue settled. But for reasons passing understanding, that did not happen. We put off the vote because there was no ‘consensus’. That is not how a council works. You get a majority. You take a vote. Move on. You don’t keep putting things off until you get a ‘consensus’ (whatever that means.) It’s why I can’t stand all the ‘head nods’. That is not how government works. One more time: take a vote. majority wins. move on. That’s it. And again, I was too nice and said nothing. Why? Well, it was not my motion. If the makers of the motion (Mahoney/Nutting) don’t care to defend their motion, why should I? I just assumed that we’d make some decision.
But I’m mentioning it here because my guess is that almost all of you who watched the meeting think that what you saw is normal. It’s not. There is no such thing as ‘consensus’ or ‘head nods’ in parliamentary procedure. All this does is further the notion that process does not matter or that things actually work better without it.
Because here’s the thing: It’s just a fact that the ‘majority’ of Des Moines favoured a name other than ‘Waterland’… as did the presiding officer. 😉 So regardless of ‘process’ you’re probably not all broken up about this dysfunction. But it actually should matter. Because that sort of thing happens all the time–including the really big things.
You either can’t tell the difference. Or don’t care–just so long as it’s not ‘Waterland Way’. 😀
Switching gears: Why is it even controversial to not name an alley after Jack? We already have Cecil Powell Park, Mary Gay Park, Sonju Community Garden. People live in Delrose Manor.
And in Seattle, nobody seems to have trouble finding things to do on Mercer Avenue or in Post Alley. By the logic I heard for other options, Seattle should immediately rename Alaska Way to “Waterfront Road.”
It’s normal to name a street or park after some bloke named Jack that no one will know about years from now. It gives you a story to tell. And a story is what creates a sense of place. You don’t need to label something ‘Backstage’ to find the back of the theatre. You just need an address so you can find it on Google Maps. 🙂
Communications Study
In last month’s BOMBSHELL! our former Parks Director was reassigned to be Communications Director. But with no budget. Also a lot of the items she seems to be working on are not exactly the ones the Council seemed to agree upon at our last Communications Study Session (we’ve had so many ‘communications study sessions’ we should start giving them names–like hurricanes.)
I was, however, pleased to see that Director Nordholm had looked into some app solutions. You’ll be shocked to hear that they are as I’ve described–off-the-shelf solutions we can implement. The goal being to give everyone in Des Moines at least one reason to get the City on your phone: be it events calendars, coupons, business marketing, news, public safety, emergency alerts, reporting concerns, permitting, pet licenses, and on and on. There is a good reason for everyone in Des Moines to want to do this. Right now.
Director Nordholm also brought in an example of a wooden suggestion box, made by residents of Wesley. Very nice. She mentioned that the City might carve the City logo into the boxes as part of a branding update. After the alley naming thing, I quipped, “Might wanna hold off on that one…” 😀 Because if the seven of us can’t agree on a frickin’ alley, imagine how any conversation over “New City Logo!” will go.
In fact, I don’t have to imagine it. As I suffered through the alley naming thing, my mind wandered back to a previous and very ‘thorough’ branding discussion around 2010. At the time, the Council was deciding on those Gateway thingees. You know… at the corner of 216th and Pac Hwy and again at Kent Des Moines and Pac Hwy. And it reminded me how we got here. Every few years the Council likes to add some new design’flair’ rather than developing one good brand and sticking with it. And that’s how we ended up with (no exaggeration) at least a dozen.
I mentioned ‘Rorshach Test’. Well, I would suggest that all the various ‘branding’ ideas you see all over the place in Des Moines tells you something about how much of a shared vision your City Council has been able to maintain over time. 😀
Weekly Update: 06/02/2024
Leave a comment on Weekly Update: 06/02/2024Some bits of business…
Future Agendas
Future Agendas is the closest thing the City currently has to a calendar of upcoming City Council topics. It’s not dynamic, ie. you have to click it every time you want to see a new version. And it’s not always accurate. But until we develop a genuine calendar, this can be very useful if there is a particular issue you don’t want to miss.
Part 150 Study…
The airport has begun a new Part 150 Noise Study. ‘Part 150’ refers to a section of FAA regulations whereby airports analyse their noise impact on the surrounding community. Ho hum, you say? Well, for one thing a Part 150 Study sets the official noise boundary around the airport. If yer house is inside it, you get sound insulation (aka a Port Package). If not, you don’t. It does a lot of other stuff which I won’t get into here. But for that reason alone, you should show up to these public workshops hosted by the Port of Seattle on June 5, June 6 and June 8. https://www.portseattle.org/page/sea-part-150-noise-study
This Part 150 Study, is the beginning of an environmental review of the entire airport called the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). And it is a very big deal. In fact, think of it this way: The 2024 SAMP is to the 1996 Third Runway what 2020 COVID was to the Spanish Flu of 1918. That’s not hyperbolic. It has the potential to be really bad. But it’s far enough in the past that it’s possible we won’t take it seriously enough–until it’s too late.
Marina Paid Parking
By the time you read this, Paid parking at the Marina will have begun. Please let the City know if you have any challenges. So far, the fob reader seems to be working flawlessly. But the paper reader has had a few flakes.
Des Moines Marina Sailors score in big race
Three Tree Point Yacht Club Skipper Gordon Kells-Murphy and the crew of Les Chevaux placed 2nd in their division of Swiftsure International Yacht Race in Victoria, BC. Swiftsure is a big deal in Northwest sailing and this is a major accomplishment! Some great video here.
City Manager Stuff
City Manager’s Report May 31, 2024
As usual, some great information. One bit of bad news: “…unfortunately, 2/3’s of the new Redondo boarding floats/docks needed to be removed as the new pile hoops were too tight, causing an unsafe condition during high and low tides…” I’ll let you know as soon as it’s good to go for the summer season.
The City also published the job listing for City Manager. If I read this? I’d apply. 🙂
Tax Levy Campaigning
You probably missed it, but last Thursday there was a Quorum Notice on the City Calendar, notifying the public that a majority (4) of the Council might be present at an event. The address was Deputy Mayor Steinmetz and the topic was ‘Levy Lid Lift’. Generally speaking, all electeds are discouraged from gathering together outside of meetings unless it is a holiday event where there’s low probability of politics. This may be legal, but given the Lid Lift vote was 4-3 I do not think it is a great idea for any faction of the Council to work collectively to support (or oppose) this ballot initiative.
When I voted ‘no’, I said that I would avoid campaigning on the topic–and I encouraged my colleagues to do the same. But less than 24 hours after the vote, the politicking began. And now this. So I’m re-thinking that position. This amplifies ‘partisanship’ that I’d hoped we’d all dial down in this transitional year. And it isn’t right for one ‘side’ to be applying resources the other side does not. It also makes me even more certain that I did the right thing (yes, after proposing the idea) still stand. In fact, I feel even stronger today than at the time.
One of the little ‘warning flags’ leading up to the vote was an apparent lack of enthusiasm from then Chief Gately. Having seen the previous (2006) Lid Lift, the Police Chief at that time could barely contain his salesmanship–as should have been the case here. His sudden departure may explain why he may have been less than gung ho. 😀
A more direct concern I had was that when we had our last Lid Lift in 2006, created exactly the kind of dedicated fund you may hear about soon. But within a year, the City still began siphoning off that ‘dedicated fund’, as they did with Marina money. As they say, “desperate times, desperate measures”. So by the time that lid lift expired in 2011, very little of the money was actually going for police. But this current ballot initiative would be permanent; not five years. So I wanted to make sure we had better guard rails in place than in 2006. Otherwise it would end up being just a generalised and permanent tax increase and I am not down with that.
Without confidence that we’ll really set aside that money for public safety and without stable leadership both at the Police Station and at City Hall, we have no business asking taxpayers for a permanent tax increase. When we have those in place? I’m in. But not until.
ADU RFI
I’ve gotten several responses to my request for interest in ADUs. THANK YOU! As you may know, we are updating our Comprehensive Plan, which will change City zoning rules for a generation. I don’t have to many specifics for you yet, except:
- There are a lot of you out there. But you have different needs. Many of you want to create multi-generational living so you can age in place with your kids and grandkids. Others want to create cottages on a large property to add income.
- I want you to have as much notice as possible when these hearings come up and I want you to show up so you can show the City that this really is a big deal.
I’m hoping the City can make these updates as flexible and inexpensive as possible.
This Week
. I encourage all parents to hear from two Highline School Directors. This is great community outreach.
Thursday 4:00pm Finance Committee. Finance Committee – 06 Jun 2024 – Agenda – Pdf This one also gets the Action-Packed Seal Of Approval!
Highlights:
- Parks and Recreation Finances
- 2023 Annual Financials
- Five-Year Forecasts
- With the Levy Lid Lift
- Without the Levy Lid Lift
- Closing the Budget Gap
- GENERAL FUND REPORT – APRIL 2024
- May 2024 Sales Tax Report
I am really liking the new Sales Tax report, which is an order of magnitude better than what we used to get.
There will also be a discussion on ‘bridging the gap’ which says:
Raising Revenues:
1) Review Parks, Recreation, and Senior Services program fees
2) Review possibility of raising B+O Tax Rates and Business License fees
Reducing Expenditures
1) Freeze Vacancies
2) Review Ongoing Long-term Extra Hires
3) Review Professional Services contracts
4) Restructure Departments for Efficiencies
This is getting interesting.
One last thing not on the agenda, but which matters. I recently saw a local realtor posting this graphic. There’s nothing unique or proprietary about it; many realtors do these sorts of infographics as part of their marketing.
You hear people talk about how tight the housing market is. But a flip side is that in recent decades Des Moines has had a remarkably consistent number of monthly property sales. Do the math. 45 sales a month translates to 2,970 homes every five years. That’s one third of our homes turning every five years. The city has become heavily dependent on taxes from real estate sales. If people stay in one place, the City suffers. I leave it to you to decide whether that is a good thing for neighbourhood quality. I just wanted to point out how complicated our mix of funding sources have become–and how tough the choices are.
Thursday 5:00pm Public Safety Committee (Agenda) Highlights:
GPS/Crisis response team update (PD) Staffing (PD)
Thursday 6:00 City Council Study Session (Agenda) Topics:
Ferry Update, Communications Study. Although these are both major topics, the packet contains no details. As has been the case for 4.4 years, this never makes me happy. I’m not getting too upset about it because Mr. George is the Interim City Manager. But I got something to say about this:
Think about every study session you’ve ever been in, say high school; college; a paid seminar. You always get the materials to be studied ahead of time. A study session without materials is just a blind lecture. And if I want a lecture, I’ll perform a seance and summon my mother-in-law. 😀
All comedy aside, here is a real question I am going to ask every finalist for next City Manager:
“Will you commit to a ‘no suprises’ policy, which will include providing, except in cases where truly impossible, every presentation to be discussed at meetings in the packet?”
Any applicant who says anything except, “Doesn’t everyone?” risks a thumbs down from moi.
There is also ‘Alley Naming’ behind the Theatre. Let’s see what the Council does with this! 😀 The Citizens Advisory Committee did a social media ‘survey’ and the top three vote-getters were:
- Backstage Alley (10 votes)
- Jack’s Alley (10 votes)
- Waterland Alley/Way (5 votes)
My preference is to name it “Jack’s Alley” for a couple of reasons. One, who doesn’t love 1Jack, right? And whenever a street has a name, it’s an opportunity to tell a story about that place. Finally, as a working musician, I find ‘Backstage Alley’ slightly confusing. If someone says ‘backstage’, I know what they mean–it’s the back of the stage. Duhhh. 😀 Anyhoo… this is one of those votes I’ve vowed to do whatever everyone else wants.
Saturday: South King Fire Open House 223rd and 16th Ave. Fire Engines? I’m so there. 🙂
Last Week
Monday 11:00am: Des Moines Memorial Drive Memorial Day Observance Sunnydale Elementary School, corner of 156th Street and Des Moines Memorial Drive, 15631 8th Ave S, Burien, 98148 to honour all our veterans who have given their lives in service of our country.
Tuesday: Port of Seattle Commission Meeting. (Agenda). Of note: The airport just hit the 2019 record of 1,240 average daily operations. To give you a sense of the growth, that is a 33% increase over the past 10 years. And the SAMP will increase that by another 33% in the next 10 years. Only a third of you have lived here since the Third Runway opened. And it’s hard to overstate how different the noise and pollution and economics have been since the Third Runway opened.
Wednesday: Reach Out Des Moines. Talking about plans for National Night Out. Coming soon!
Thursday 8:00am – Noon Redondo Curbside Chat with Des Moines Police Department. Come talk with our police at the Redondo Square Shopping Center on Pacific Highway and 272nd (on east side facing Pac Hwy.)
Saturday: Mt. Rainier High School Arts Festival Jazz Band. Most people don’t know that music programs in our schools are either suffering or non-existent. I do whatever I can to support and promote these events because I think every teenager in America should have the right to play a 2Benny Goodman solo! Keeeding. These kids sounded great. Follow their music dept. on Facebook. And here’s a Youtube video I found for your daily Duke Ellington fix. 🙂
1I didn’t want to post a piccie of Jack without his permission. But if you spend time on Marine View Drive, and spot a silver-haired gentleman with a really ornate bowling shirt? That’s Jack. He’s everywhere. 🙂
2The moment you start playing bebop, you automatically head down a road of heavy sarcasm. There is simply no such thing as an unironic jazz musician. The better you play, the worse it gets. 😀