This Week
All week I’m gonna be trying to get the word out about this. If you’d care to join me in knocking on some doors in Pacific Ridge? Please let me know. 🙂
I gotta be honest. Other than that? Not much going on. (Well, that I’m gonna tell you about. 😀 ) Giving me a call and let me know what’s happening in your part of the world. (206) 878-0578. 🙂
Whoops?
OK, actually, SeaTacNoise.Info just celebrated our 200,000th page and our sixth anniversary. For those of you not clued in, SeaTacNoise.Info is basically a digital museum of everything having to do with the airport from the community POV. We’re the first, the largest, and… the only one. 😀
There are a gajillion places to learn about ‘the history of flight’ or airports or ‘aviation’ but they’re all from the POV of pilots and passengers and basically how great it is. 😀 We’re about the communities that live next to all that stuff. Some of it is good. Most of it is, objectively speaking, not.
If we could do so easily, we’d probably rename the site:
EverythingYouThinkYouKnowaboutSeaTacAirportIsWrong.whoops
Because, everything you think you know about Sea-Tac Airport is wrong. Whoops. 😀
In 100 words, we’re exactly like any mature industry. When things were firing up in the 60’s, Boeing created lots of jobs. But as any industry matures, the profits move away. The jobs move away. The HQ moves away. But the people near the factory are left with terrible negative impacts that never get addressed. And the reason it’s soooooooo hard to rebalance is because: a) people are so nostalgic for a world that no longer exists and b) the industry simply cannot make money if it pays what it owes. ie. if the entire financial model is based on not paying people for the community impacts. Des Moines is to the airport what the suburbs of Detroit were to the auto industry in Detroit.
And if yer bugged about the airport and wonder why things seem impossible? That’s the reason. So if you have a chance, head on over there and take a look around. If it seems confusing? You’re not wrong. 😀 We’ve uploaded a ton of stuff. But it’s been mostly technical stuff for researchers and it’s been really hard to find basic stuff like “Why can’t they create a curfew?”
We need you to ask us some questions so we can figure out how to explain it in a way that makes sense for normal (non-technical expert) people. 🙂Â
Last Week
Thursday: 4:00PM Economic Development Committee Meeting (Agenda) (Video). Staff will provide an update on the Fast Ferry Service Pilot Project.
Thursday: 5:00PM Municipal Facilities Committee Meeting (Agenda)(Video) The City Manager provided an update on the Fast Ferry Service Pilot Project.
- The new park has complaints re. security. City Manager says we will utilise private security from Marina. Closing off Fifth Ave not until at least 2024?
- Mahoney comments: Storyboards. Great listening sessions. Great culture. Viewing Ferry, kicking butt going in and kicking butt going out.
- Boat Hoist (Mahoney refers to as ‘sling’ which us old people know as the launch removed in 2008.) Replacement has been permitted and 45% design (wow!) and is included in Phase 1 of the dock replacement project (L, M, and N docks)–nothing on tenant restroom project.
- The new Park will be getting the following Story Pole. City has plans to have ongoing relationship w tribal historian (Lizard Woman.)
Thursday: 6:00PM City Council Meeting (Agenda)Â (Video) Some highlights:
- The City Manager gave the same update on the Ferry Pilot as he did at 4:00PM and then 5:00PM.
- We voted to accept a grant to help defray the cost of cases thrown out due to the Blake Decision. The packet said there are 228 cases. But then the court clerk suggested that number might be more like 55,000? I was chastised by City Manager for being hard on Court Clerk. But 228 to 55,000? 😀 Yes, I have questions.
- Washington State Opioid Distributor Settlement Agreement.
- There will be a new “Cash Handling” presentation. Every time I think “Legacy” has stopped being a thing? It’s still a thing. 😀 It was a necessary thing, but there was a sentence which was yet another passive aggressive dig. I asked that those five words be excised… and… why do I bother? 😀
New Items For Consideration
- Councilmember Nutting wants the City to create a formal letter in support of the Highline School Levy. I’m not sure I support it because, frankly, I’m not all that jazzed about these levies. How can this be, Harris? Why, why, you child hater! 😀
- No, the levy won’t increase your taxes. But the fact is, the levy is being extended to replace three schools (including Pacific Middle School) which were funded with the Third Runway settlement and a 2002 Highline Levy. Pacific Middle School was originally scheduled to be completed by 2016 with that original tranche of money.
-  HSD401 got a truly extraordinary amount of ARPA Stimulus money. They’re per pupil funding is near $24,000! To put that in perspective, the current tuition at Kennedy Catholic School is $16,500! Since when does a private school cost less than a public school?
- And just between you and me and the wall? I am not entirely thrilled with the lack of programs at our Des Moines schools. South DM is definitely not getting the choices as the north end of the district.
- I’m not saying don’t vote for it. I probably will. But I’m no longer auto-voting ‘Yes’ on everything ‘Highline’. At least, not until programs here start getting the same attention as the rest of the District. I want the new Super to succeed. I’m really excited with our new Director Hagos. But somehow we gotta find a way to send a message: send more programs to Des Moines, now!
- I proposed that we do a review of Code Enforcement, which did not get a second. But it should have. We had a complaint from a local business on Pac Hwy and he was only echoing two other complaints I’ve received from business on Pac Highway. I said that I had been getting complaints about code enforcement from both residents and business. The City Manager chastised me for not reporting these to the administration, when he was part of an email chain on one of these just last week.
It’s all Code Enforcement
I had a conversation with a long-time cashier at a local retail store and she told me that, for the first time in her career she is scared. I’ve known her for years and thought she was immune. Like many, she really does feel like the police don’t care–unless there are shots fired. But she can’t say that to the police for fear of appearing unsupportive.
To our new police. We all appreciate you. I wish the City Manager would tell people about these surprise presentations so we could get more of the public to show up with their support. This isn’t on you. It’s on us.
To my colleagues: Pac Hwy? Redondo? It’s all code enforcement. We had half a dozen people in the audience begging us to do something and the Council’s response was utterly tone-deaf. Asking the Council to review Code Enforcement was a no-brainer. It would have shown we’re willing to try something different. And your willingness to do the wrong thing just to spite me shows how far we are (already) from the “New Council” of just eight months ago. Shame.
Comments
I mentioned Ultrafine Particulates again. Look, this is one of those things that we’ve gotten so used to we don’t see it as a problem. It’s like lead back in the day. UFPs from aircraft, like lead from gas engine exhaust, are invisible, odorless and they have some terrible health consequences. We got lead out of gasoline and that has saved hundreds of thousands of lives and (literally) made every child smarter. (Lead exposure for kids reduces IQ among other things.) UFPs are not being monitored and they should be. The City of SeaTac tends to get those types of studies because decision makers (wrongly) think that being next to the airport has the worst health effects. We don’t know that. In fact with lead, dosages don’t matter that much. That’s why we need a monitor in DM. It’s the only way we get paid for the health impacts.
13 Days
For those of you who don’t enjoy my sparkling prose in general, or just to save yourself some time? Skip to the Big Reveal. 🙂 Some people have told me that they find it somehow inappropriate to post my opinions off the dais. I would point out that, unlike other cities, we are generally not afforded the opportunity for open discussion after such presentations. Therefore, this article is the reply I would have given from the dais if our Council Rules were more like those in other cities.
Could we get a copy of those numbers to council member Harris and Councilmember Achziger just so they have them for the rest of us before the end of the meeting? That would be great.
At the beginning of our 25 August meeting, the City Manager gave a glowing progress report on the first thirteen days of our ferry pilot program. At the end of which, Mayor Mahoney wanted to make certain that I received a print-out of the fare box report after thirteen days of service, which Bonnie Wilkins printed out and handed me as I was leaving. (Now that’s service. 😀 )
This is success?
Now, I do have a visual disability which prevents me from seeing these presentations on the big screen–and the City Manager just refuses to provide them ahead of time. But my ears still work. And this was the third time I’d heard the presentation, which had been given at 4:00PM for Chair Nutting’s Economic Development Committee and then again at 5:00PM for also Chair Nutting’s Municipal Facilities Committee. So I pretty much had it memorised. 🙂 And what I heard was this: We’re already losing at least as much money as I forecast in my first article on the topic, This Is Insane.
Week | †Bookings | Potential Pax | Actual Pax | Δ | Subtotal | Tax | Potential Revenue | Actual Revenue | *Estimated Cost | *Profit (Loss) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1024 | 2,480 | 2,752 | 111% | $0 | $0 | 24,800 | $0 | $20,685 | ($20,685) |
2 | 815 | 2,480 | 1,943 | 78% | $11,182 | $1,133 | 24,800 | $11,695 | $20,685 | ($8,990) |
3 | 548 | 2,480 | 1,391 | 56% | $7,701 | $780 | 24,800 | $8,230 | $20,685 | ($12,455) |
Totals | 7,440 | 6,086 | 81% | $74,400 | $19,925 | $62,055 | ($42,130) |
Some random observations:
- We may have a huge Blues & Brews rush in Week 3. And the holiday weekend may also be pretty good (fingers crossed.) But we are not making money, because it’s impossible to make money.
- And because I’m nice, my profit formula is waaaaaaaaaaay too generous because I’m not including fuel. Granted, since we’re selling it to ourselves, it’s cheap fuel, but it is definitely not free fuel. And, I am not including over $200,000 in consultant fees, plus another $85,000 in marketing costs..
- First week, 2,780 pax. Which is fantastic, but also a bit weird since the boat has 62 seats and had 40 sailings–which is 2,480. OK, so who was water skiiing? 😀
- Second week: $11,200 from 1,943 pax. Which means we generated $5.75/seat. And just to be clear, our revenue potential is $24,800. Maybe we’re handling mostly seniors?
- Bookings are down each week.
- And also, if your marketing pre-spend is $70,000 (including half-pagers in the Sunday Times) and you give it away for a week? If your initial ridership was not fabulous I’d be surprised.
- I wonder if we’re tracking walk-ons.
- I wonder if we’re tracking parking at Marina.
I wonder a lot of things. 😀
Visitors Guide
I’m just a dumb engineer, but when you run ads with QR codes that do not work, and only think to offer a restaurant guide or street map for visitors after the Week 3, I gotta wonder about our marketing efforts.
(I would also remind the public that there is already a presentable a Restaurant List, with PDF, for visitors here at https:/takeoutdesmoines.com.)
One Time Money For One Time Expenses
During his presentation, and without naming moi, the City Manager pointed out an error I have been making in my blog. The Council had not been advised as to the source of the funds we are using to pay for the ‘beta’. So, I had been speculating that it was in the $2.5M of ARPA money allocated to ‘the marina’. Apparently not. We learned tonight that it is, in fact, from our Capital Projects fund.
That fund is meant to set aside the one-time money we get from construction. The idea is to use that for our own long term projects such as Parks.
So my other main objection also remains. We’re still using one-time money to test a project that will have ongoing expenses which are waaaaaaaay beyond this thing’s revenue potential. How can we fund something like this on an ongoing basis with one-time money?
This use of funds goes against the purpose of that capital fund and I object that it was used as a funding source without obtaining authorisation by the City Council.
The phrase “one-time money for one-time projects” is considered a cornerstone of good municipal budgeting. (It was the mantra of former Mayor 3Dave Kaplan.) It’s bad practice to use one-time money for ongoing expenses because one-time money is unpredictable. If you depend on one-time money for ongoing expenses, if the one-time money runs out (for example if there’s a recession and construction stops)? You can no longer pay for those ongoing expenses.
So good practice is to only use sustainable revenue–money you can count on every month–for ongoing expenses. For example, property and utility taxes are among the right ways to pay for salaries.
Now, most of you have heard by now about our city’s long series of financial crises–and how the current majority ‘saved the city’. And in fact, when things began to turn around, Mayor Dave and then Mayor Pina swore that bad practices like using one-time money for ongoing projects were over for good.
Summary
- It’s a very fun thing to do and since we’ve already paid for it. I encourage everyone to give it a shot.
- But we’re losing as much money as expected.
- We paid an absolute fortune for a truly half-assed roll-out and I’m sounding harsh because for this kind of money we should not have left any money on the table for all our local businesses.
- We’re using one-time money from a fund never meant for ongoing expenses. So we’re robbing from other, proper purposes.
- And if we do continue, we have no ongoing way to pay for it without robbing from core functions or following the same bad practices as previous administrations.
The Big Reveal
OK, above I was trying to be generous. Here is something much closer to the real costs. And the red number is the more realistic loss. In truth, by early next week we’ll already have lost $100,000.
Week | †Bookings | Potential Pax | Actual Pax | Δ | Subtotal | Tax | Potential Revenue | Actual Revenue | *Estimated Cost | *Profit (Loss) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1024 | 2,480 | 2,752 | 111% | $0 | $0 | 24,800 | $0 | $38,362 | ($38,362) |
2 | 815 | 2,480 | 1,943 | 78% | $11,182 | $1,133 | 24,800 | $11,695 | $38,362 | ($26,667) |
3 | 548 | 2,480 | 1,391 | 56% | $7,701 | $780 | 24,800 | $8,230 | $38,362 | ($30,132) |
Totals | 7,440 | 6,086 | 81% | $74,400 | $19,925 | $115,086 | ($95,161) |
According to the contract we signed below we’re paying $470,263 for 43 days of sailing. I’m (again) going to be generous and remove a lot of that junk from the table since ‘marketing’ and ‘setting up ticketing system’ might be things that carry into the future. (I’m too nice, they’ll be redone, of course.) And I’ve ignored the $90,000 in ongoing/recurring ‘consultant’ fees and I threw out the other advertising we’ve done which is at least another $90k.
But everything else, $328,913 is a recurring cost. Ops. Fuel. Insurance. Moorage. That’s still $329,913 for 43 days of sailing. Which makes the weekly nut: $38,362.
Which means that again, even at 100% adult (no seniors, kiddos or freebies) ridership, we will always lose at least:
- $13,562 a week… or
- $56,960 a month.. or…
- $683,524 a year.
These are the results that caused the Mayor to be positively smug; after only 13 days of service. On one level, I admire a certain degree of confidence in any form of promotion. It called to mind the expression “fake it ’til ya make it” which I recall vividly from my time in the music biz.
River City
Speaking of which, years ago, I had the honour of playing in a revival of The Music Man, with the author, Meredith Willson, in the house. I got to shake his hand! And 1I haven’t washed that hand since. That is how much I love that show.
The Music Man is the story of a huckster, Professor Harold Hill, who comes to a certain town in Iowa with a fairly elaborate grift. He pre-sells band instruments and uniforms to locals along with a method of musical instruction he calls “The Think System.” No practicing required.
The townspeople pride themselves as practical, no-nonsense people. But their town leaders have been itching to do something for their growing town for quite some time. And this is the real point of the story. Initially, Hill is able to prey on the town, not so much because the parents love their kids, but because of their exaggerated sense of their own sophistication. He convinces everyone that having a great band will put their town on the map! They want to believe so much that they completely ignore how absurd it is. Even the prudish Marian The Librarian (the town’s piano teacher!) is taken in–because the guy is just so damned charming.
The Professor takes the deposits and tells them that the rest is due on delivery. (He does order the instruments– but COD–pockets the deposits, and plans to leave a day or two before the gear shows up.)
Of course, the town figures out it’s all a scam. At the climax, they get ready to tar and feather the Professor. But his new girlfriend Marian The Librarian 😀 leaps to his defense and demands they give him a chance to prove himself. What has he got to lose, right? So he slumps up to the podium, raises his baton and begins ‘conducting’ his new band. And let me tell ya… 2those kids absolutely suuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck. 😀
But… turns out that no one cares. When that racket commences, all those parents hear is what they want to hear. It’s their kid, in a crisp new uniform, playing a shiny new horn, looking mighty happy. When we (the real musicians) play “Seventy Six Trombones” that’s what the parents are hearing in their heads. So, the Professor becomes a hero, gets the girl (who thinks she’ll reform him 😀 ), and the town continues on–a bit poorer, and a bit more tone deaf than before.
†Bookings don’t correlate with weekly traffic because although you may book today, your trip may be three weeks from now.
1Don’t worry. I’m sure I’ve washed my right hand at least four billion times since the pandemic began. 🙂
2In this scene, you’re required to sound like a child. playing really, really baaad. One of the tougher things for a professional musician to do–you spend years trying not to sound like this.
3I am actually not crying “hypocrite!” as much as it may seem. The fact is, all City Councils are under pressure by residents to maintain services; ‘good budgeting’ be damned. Using one-time money for the current ferry pilot is far more egregious because today, there is no crisis to use as an excuse.
1I know what yer thinking. 😀
2I just made that up. Feel free to use it.